Rev D has been the aerospace standard since 2016, and it's what your registrar will audit you against today. But its replacement is close: the IAQG is merging the American, European and Asian versions into a single international document called IA9100, aligned to the ISO 9001 edition that published last week. If you're starting certification now, you'll certify to Rev D and transition afterward — and the work is considerably cheaper if you build with what's coming already in mind.
Book a free 30-minute callThirty minutes to work out where your system stands, what certification would take, and which parts are worth building for the new revision now rather than twice.
The standard has not published yet, so anyone giving you clause numbers is guessing. What the IAQG has communicated publicly is clear enough to plan around, and three points matter commercially.
IA9100 stands for International Aerospace, and it replaces the separate AS9100, EN 9100 and JISQ 9100 designations with one globally released document. The structural foundation comes from Rev D. This is a revision and a rebrand, not a new standard built from scratch.
Until IA9100 publishes and registrars are accredited to audit against it, Rev D is what you certify to. Transition windows for this standard have historically run two to three years, and industry expectation is around three, putting the deadline near late 2029. Waiting to start is not the cheaper option — it just means bidding work you can't win in the meantime.
Product safety, configuration management and counterfeit parts prevention are hallmarks of this standard and are expected to remain. What the IAQG has signalled is modernization around them: supplier management, digital assurance, supply chain resilience, and human factors treated seriously in root cause analysis rather than as a box on a form.
AS9100 contains ISO 9001 in full and adds aerospace requirements on top. Those additions are where certification is won or lost, because they are the clauses your auditor knows best and the ones a shop coming from commercial work has usually never had to evidence. The clause numbers below are Rev D.
To be clear about something the market often muddles: AS9100 is a standalone certification and you do not need an ISO 9001 certificate first. No registrar will ask for one. But AS9100 contains ISO 9001 in its entirety, which means roughly three quarters of the work of building an AS9100 system is building a sound quality system, full stop.
That's why my material is structured in two parts. The implementation course builds the quality system itself, clause by clause, with the procedures and forms written out and a completed example of each. The aerospace add-on then covers what AS9100 requires that ISO 9001 doesn't: operational risk management, configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, critical items and key characteristics, special process validation, first article inspection, FOD prevention, and the supply chain flow-down obligations.
Work through the first part and you have a system that would satisfy an ISO 9001 auditor. Add the second and you have one built for an aerospace registrar. Nothing from the first part gets thrown away — and because the course is written to the 2026 edition of ISO 9001, you are building on the foundation IA9100 will align to rather than on the one it's replacing.
I'm Steve Kent. I've spent over forty years in quality management, most recently as a Quality Director, with roughly twenty of those years on ISO 9001 and its derivatives — AS9100 in aerospace and ISO 13485 in medical devices.
I've built quality systems from nothing and rebuilt ones that had quietly stopped working. I've prepared companies for registrar audits and I've sat on the other side of the table during them, which matters more than it sounds: knowing what an auditor is looking for is a different thing from knowing what the clause says.
Falcon Quality is a one-person practice by choice. There's no account manager and no junior consultant doing the work under my name. If you engage me, you get me.
I'll also tell you plainly when something sits outside what I do. I build quality systems and prepare organizations for audit. I am not a registrar, I don't issue certificates, and I'll say so when you need a specialist — an accredited auditor, or an engineering authority on a process — rather than pretending the work is mine to do.
More about how I work
Four stages. An aerospace build takes longer than an ISO 9001 build, mostly because of the evidence the aerospace clauses demand and because your registrar's aerospace-qualified auditors are in shorter supply than their general ones. Anyone quoting you a fixed duration before seeing your operation is guessing.
A clause-by-clause review against Rev D, with the expected IA9100 changes noted so you build once rather than twice. This is also where scope exclusions get settled honestly.
Procedures, forms and records written for how your shop actually runs — including the aerospace-specific ones: configuration control, FAI, risk management, counterfeit parts, FOD, critical items.
Training, a full internal audit cycle, and a real management review. Aerospace auditors want to see the system operating and producing results, and performance data they can test.
Choosing an accredited registrar, mock audit, Stage 1 and Stage 2 preparation, OASIS registration, and support closing whatever findings come out.
The two courses together are the self-directed path. For aerospace work I'd advise adding consulting calls to them — more strongly than I would for ISO 9001 alone. The aerospace clauses are the ones where a course can only take you so far: which of your processes count as special processes and what their validation has to demonstrate, how your configuration control should work against your customers' revision practices, what your FAI package needs to contain for the parts you actually make, and where your risk process has to bite rather than document. Those answers depend on your product and your customers. The call is free either way.
Eight modules building the quality system clause by clause, written to the 2026 edition of ISO 9001, with every procedure and form already drafted and a completed example of each. This is the three quarters of AS9100 that is simply sound quality management.
See what's coveredEverything AS9100 requires that ISO 9001 doesn't — operational risk management, configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, critical items and key characteristics, special process validation, first article inspection, FOD prevention and supply chain flow-down — with the forms to support each.
Ask me about the add-onOne-to-one time on the decisions a course can't make for you: special process validation, configuration control, FAI packages, audit preparation. Blocks of five calls for $600 or ten for $1,000. Most people doing aerospace work want these alongside the courses.
How the calls workBefore any of that, the free gap analysis gives you a reading on the ISO 9001 foundation — the part both standards share. It won't cover configuration management, FAI or the other aerospace clauses, so treat it as a temperature check rather than an AS9100 audit. Start the assessment
Thirty minutes, no charge, no obligation. Tell me what you make, who your customers are and what state your system is in, and I'll tell you what certification would take — and which parts are worth building now for the revision that's coming.
Sixty-seven questions across every clause of ISO 9001, scored by section. Set aside 30 to 45 minutes. Free, and your answers save as you go.
ISO 9001, AS9100 and ISO 13485 consulting and courses for small and medium manufacturers. A one-person practice — you work with me, not an account manager.
Falcon Quality is an independent consultancy. It is not a certification body, a registrar or an accreditation organization, and it does not issue certificates. ISO 9001, AS9100 and ISO 13485 are the property of their respective standards organizations.